Where
do we draw the line with health: does it become a part of public policy or
should it be a personal responsibility? This question is at the forefront of
the "vaccine war," a debate over whether inoculations are safe or
unsafe, and whether they should be a personal choice or mandatory. Vaccines
have increased our lifespan by over 30 years, but are they worth the risks they
potentially pose?
In the
first six years of life, a child will receive 35 inoculations to fight 14
diseases; this is four times the number of vaccines than a child from the
1970's received. Why such a large jump? All of the vaccines being administered
are basically wiping out certain diseases. Doctors find it necessary to keep on
vaccinating the population against these diseases so there is no spontaneous
outbreaks. To doctors, the benefits of vaccines are clear - they are an easy
preventative measure from some terrible diseases that can often be fatal. Why
suffer the illness if it can be prevented?
Some
parents are refusing to vaccinate their children. They don't find some of the
vaccines necessary, and deem sickness as "a part of childhood." Young
parents didn't see diseases, like measles, mumps, or polio, while growing up. They
don't realize the dangers and suffering it poses. However, doctors worry that
these parents will bring back diseases that haven't been seen for a long time,
as a sudden outbreak. These parents are generally more afraid of the risks that
vaccines pose rather than the diseases they are preventing. Autism, most notably,
is believed by many to be a result of vaccines. In a small percentage of the
vaccinated population, brain injury, by chance, can occur; autism is a brain
injury. Researchers don't doubt that vaccines can cause autism, but they do
question: was autism bound to come up in the child eventually and did the
vaccine just make it happen sooner rather than later? Much research has gone
into this question, but it is still unanswered.
With
information readily available on the internet today, people can choose what
they want to believe about vaccine horror stories. Internet can be noted as
"fuel on the fire of the anti-vaccine" movement. Health officials
worry because people "are more likely to believe something they see on
YouTube than something from the CDC."
Politically,
California has allowed the Personal Belief Exemption, which has allowed parents
to not vaccinate their children and still allow the children into schools.
Personally, I believe that vaccination should be a personal choice, so I do not
want to see politicians getting involved. However, I think that parents are not
protecting their children by not vaccinating them, especially against the main
diseases that are typically required by schools. Also, I think that health
insurance companies would prefer having vaccinations as a requirement because
it would ultimately be less expensive for them to prevent disease rather than
having to treat it.
"The Vaccine War." Frontline. PBS, n.d.
Web. 29 Nov. 2012.
<http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/vaccines/view/>.
thanks. By the way, the study McCarthy relied on has been found suspect.
ReplyDelete